Главная » Файлы » ЦИТИСЭ № 1(10), 2017г. » 08.00.00 Экономические науки

Simionov L.M. TENSIONS, PROXIMITY AND COMPLEMENTARITY: DWELLING UPON EU-RUSSIA NEIGHBOURLY RELATIONS
[ Скачать с сервера (235.6 Kb) ] 31.12.2016, 18:22

Loredana Maria Simionov - Researcher, PhD at Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, RomaniaFaculty of Law, Centre for European Studies– Research Department, e-mail: loredana.simionov@uaic.ro

Abstract. Despite several paradigm differences, tensions and challenges that bring back chills from the Cold War times, the EU and Russia cannot escape their cooperation. Being the main geopolitical entities in Europe and sharing borders, neighbours, economic and security concerns, both actors are bound to continue and develop their relations. Isolationism is out of the question in the current globalised and interconnected world. Thus, the current article offers a general outlook at the factors and characteristic which will always define their interaction and which will subsequently force EU and Russia into cooperating. The research is based on a theoretical framework defined by two main concepts: proximity and complementarity.

Keywords: EU, Russia, complementarity, proximity, cooperation

 

 

References

  1. Arbatova, N. (2016), Geopolitical challenges for the post-bipolar Europe, Eastern Journal for European Studies, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 31-46.
  2. Bahgat, G. (2006), Europe’s Energy Security: challenges and opportunities, International Affairs Vol. 82, No.5, pp. 961-975, Blackwell Publishing House, London.
  3. Denboer, A. (2010), Emmanuel Levinas, ethics and rupturing the politics, in International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues, edited by Moore, Cerwyn and Farrands, Chris, Routledge, New York.
  4. Finon, D. and Locatelli C. (2007), “Russian and European gas interdependence: Could contractual trade channel geopolitics?”. Energy Policy, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 423-442.
  5. Krickovic, A, (2015), “When Interdependence Produces Conflict: EU-Russia Energy Relations as a Security Dilemma”. Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 36 (1), pp. 3-26.
  6. Leonard, M., and Popescu, N. (2007), “A Power Audit of EU–Russia Relations”, European Council on Foreign Relations. available at ://ecfr.3cdn.net/ 456050fa3e8ce10341_ 9zm6i2293.pdf, accessed on February 20th 2017, pp. 13–14.
  7. Light, M. (2008), Russia and the EU: Strategic Partners or Strategic Rivals?, JCMS, Vol. 46, Supliment, pp. 7–27, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  8. Paillard, C. A. (2010), Rethinking Russia: Russia and Europe’s Mutual Energy Dependence, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 65-84.
  9. Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (2003), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, California: Stanford University Press.
  10. Pop, A. (2016), From cooperation to confrontation: the impact of bilateral perceptions and interactions on the EU-Russia relations in the context of shared neighbourhood, Eastern Journal for European Studies, Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp. 47-70.
  11. Proedrou, F. (2007), “The EU–Russia Energy Approach under the Prism of Interdependence”. European Security, Vol. 16 (3-4), pp. 329-355.
  12. Sakwa, R. (2012), “Looking for a greater Europe: From mutual dependence to an international regime”, Communist and post-communist studies, Vol. 45 (3-4), pp. 315-325.
  13. Starr, H. (2005), Territory, Proximity, and Spatiality: The Geography of International Conflict, International Studies Review, No. 7, pp. 387–406.
  14. Vecchi, S. (2011), “European Union – Russian Federation Sustainable proximity”, EU-Russia Centre, at: http://www.eu-russiacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/ 03/European-Union-Russian-Federation-sustainable-proximity.pdf, accessed on 20th of February, 2017.
Категория: 08.00.00 Экономические науки | Добавил: Admin | Теги: complementarity, russia, Proximity, cooperation, eu
Просмотров: 231 | Загрузок: 19